"Metro Plaza", 3rd & 4th Floor, E-5 Arera Colony, Bittan Market, Bhopal – 462  016
 

 

 

 

 

Contact Nos
Complaints/ Suggestion

 

TARIFF ORDER 

 

4.4           Transmission and Distribution Losses

4.4.1        Almost all the respondents have very vehemently contended that the high T&D losses indicate the callous negligence and inefficiency of the Board and its utter failure to check theft and pilferage, being caused partially due to the abetment and involvement of its own staff. Ujjain Power-Loom Cloth Association represented that with additional revenue generated by curbing theft, the increase in tariff will not be required. Similar views were expressed by Shri Pratap Verma and Shri N.K. Janglwa of MP Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Indore, Shri Kailash Vijayavargiya (Mayor Indore) and Shri Lodha, Chartered Accountant, for M.P. Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Gwalior. Public participation in checking thefts was emphasized by Shri N.K. Janglwa by citing example of Bangladesh. Shri P.L. Nene proposed installation of capacitors to reduce T&D losses.

4.4.2        Realising the importance of correct assessment of T&D losses, the Commission got a sample survey conducted which confirmed the high level of T&D losses of about 50 percent in the existing system of the Board. The Commission has directed the Board to take appropriate steps to reduce these losses progressively.

4.5           Operational Norms for Thermal and Hydroelectric Power Stations

4.5.1        A number of individuals and organizations including Shri Ajit Verma of Jailok Study Circle Jabalpur pointed out that the expenditure of the Board can be reduced significantly by improving operational parameters to feasible limits. They pointed out irregularities in transport of coal and payment thereof without considering the grades of coal actually received. Reduction in auxiliary consumption, coal consumption and fuel oil consumption was also suggested.

4.5.2        The Commission got a detailed study conducted on operational norms taking into consideration the efficiencies achieved by the Board’s plants in earlier years, by similar plants working in other states and by Central undertakings and also the norms suggested by the Central Electricity Authority / Ministry of Power Government of India. The Commission has not allowed the figures of expenditure projected by the Board in the petition and has reduced it on relevant items on the basis of norms, worked out on the above basis which also conforms to the prudent commercial practice.

4.6           O&M Expenditure

4.6.1        It has been pointed out that O&M Expenses of the Board are higher than the norms fixed by the Central Electricity Authority. Expenditure on employees can also be curtailed.

4.6.2        The Commission got a study conducted for expenditure on repairs and maintenance as also the expenditure on employees, considering various norms and the performance of other utilities. The Commission has accordingly curtailed the O&M expenditure indicated by the Board in its petition.

4.7           Outstanding Dues of Board

4.7.1        Sri P.L. Nene (Indore) and others were critical of the Board for the high level of its revenue arrears. Sri Bharat Bhushan Bhargava (Gwalior) doubted as to how the figures of bad debts (which were very high) could be the same for different years and how much of these had been written off. They were also critical of the non-realization of arrears from large industries.

4.7.2        The Commission has taken serious note of the unacceptable high level of arrears and the lack of determination shown by the Board in liquidating it. The Commission has directed the Board to ensure dis-connection of defaulting consumers and realization of arrears in a determined manner.

4.8           Government Subsidy

4.8.1        The State Government subsidises the Board against free supply of electricity to weaker sections and agriculture consumers. Several individuals, and organizations deplored that the level of subsidy provided by the State Government to the Board has been going down which is the main cause of financial problems of the Board. The level of subsidy indicated in the Board’s petition was considered inadequate by Pithampur Audyogik Sangthan. Shri Kailash Joshi, Member Rajya Sahba, expressed similar views.

4.8.2        The State Government, in the budget for 2001-02 has made provision for subsidy  against free supply to SLP connections and agriculture connections upto 5 HP and also towards compensation of rural electrification losses (subsidy against low agriculture tariff) to the Board. The Commission has considered the same while deciding tariff. However, the Commission too, feels that current level of subsidy is inadequate.

 

4.9           Domestic Tariff

 

4.9.1        Shri Babulal Gaur, MLA, Shri Shailendra Pradhan (Bhopal), Shri Bhawani Shanker Ghosh (Jabalpur), Shri B.N Sharma (Indore) and others stated that minimum charge of Rs. 180 per month proposed by the Board was very high. Shri G.D. Agarwal and Shri MBL Bhatnagar (Gwalior) suggested that number of slabs in domestic tariff should be increased. Viapari Association, Khargone stated that abolition of slabs will place undue burden on the middle class. Shri Hemant Khode, President, Abhibhashak Sangh Indore, Shri L.N. Sharma, Advocate Indore and several others also objected to the high minimum charge of Rs. 180 pm proposed by the Board.

4.9.2        The Commission shares these concerns and has decided that the domestic tariff will have five slabs in place of existing three and not one alone as proposed by the Board. Considering the problems of small consumers, the Commission has allowed only a nominal increase in minimum charges.

4.10         Agricultural Tariff

4.10.1   The Commission allowed special public hearing to cultivator group on 11th July, 2001 at Indore. Sarva Shri Amba Ram Mukati, Chandra Vallabh, Kanhaiya Lal Yadav Indore and others opposed Board’s proposal concerning this category and prayed that load factor for agriculture for 2001-02 should be 15 percent instead of 18 percent as proposed by the Board. They also expressed concern over poor quality, frequent interruptions and long spells of non-availability of power. The cultivators have also expressed strong opposition to the cropwise flat rate tariff proposed by the Board as the crop seasons overlap and the cultivators may not irrigate their total land in any particular crop season. . Shri. Raj Narayan Bharadwaj, Shri Shyam Sunder Mishra of Akhil Bhartiya Kisan Sabha, (Jabalpur) Shri Satish Tiwari President, Nagar Panchayat Barahi (Jabalpur) and Shri Ram Narayan Sharma, Mudhyiakheda (Morena) submitted that villages were being neglected in supply of Power

4.10.2         The Commission has considered these observations. A study by the Commission also indicated a load factor of 15 percent for 2001-02 which has been adopted. The Commission is in agreement that the crop wise tariff proposed by the Board is not amenable to fair assessment and has thus retained the present horse-power-wise classification of agricultural pump sets for tariff determination, on the basis of monthly slab rate per HP per month. Commission has given directions to the Board for improvement of quality and reliability of power for the agricultural sector.