![]() |
|
![]() |
| "Metro Plaza", 3rd & 4th Floor, E-5 Arera Colony, Bittan Market, Bhopal – 462 016 | ||
|
|
TARIFF ORDER
3.9.2 Realisation of Arrears
A
substantial portion of revenue from
government departments remains in
arrears. Out of a total arrears of
Rs. 1706.77 crores as at the end of
December 2000, the arrears
pertaining to government departments
was Rs. 947.55 crores. Total amount
under litigation is Rs. 229.13
crores. The present collection
efficiency as stated is 94% which is
proposed to be improved to 95% in
2001-02.
3.9.3
Control
on theft of energy
The
following steps have been taken by
the Board to prevent theft of energy
and malpractices:
(i)
Formation of Flying Squad under
administrative control of Member (F&RM).
(ii)
Formation of District Level Team
with the help of District
administration and Police.
(iii) Intensive
checking by O&M staff.
(iv) Checking by
AE (Vig.)
(v)
Incentive to persons who give
information about theft of energy
leading to its detection.
(vi) Meter
reading by qualified ITI persons
engaged on contract.
(vii) Instructions
issued to all field officers to take
check readings of the private HT
consumers after a fortnight and to
ensure that the consumers do not get
opportunity to tamper with the meter
or manipulate.
(viii) Every year, the
connections of all the HT consumers
are tested to ensure that they are
recording correct energy consumed by
them. Fortnightly meter reading of
HT consumers is also being done.
3.10 Status of Accounts
3.10.1
On the
reorganisation under the Madhya
Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000
from 1st November, 2000,
the Government of the State of
Madhya Pradesh constituted the
Madhya Pradesh State Electricity
Board
(MPSEB) and the Government
of the State of Chattisgarh
constituted the Chattisgarh State
Electricity Board (CSEB) under
section 5 of the Electricity
(Supply) Act, 1948 in pursuance to
section 58(4) of the said Act. The
Government of India (Ministry of
Power) in its Order No. 42/8/2000 -
R&R dated 12th April,
2001 notified that the assets,
liabilities, rights and undertakings
of the existing Board (MPEB) shall
provisionally pass on to the
successor Boards w.e.f. 15.04.2001
in the following manner:
(i)
Fixed assets (land and buildings, installed
plants and machinery, transmission
and distribution systems etc.)
situated in either State will pass
on to the successor Board.
(ii)
Movable assets and stores of the field
units shall be transferred on the
basis of location. Stores,
furniture and vehicles of the Head
Office shall be apportioned
according to the year of purchase
in the population ratio of 1762:
4857 (26.62% : 73.38%).
(iii)
Project / Asset specific liability of the existing Board shall be passed
on to the State / successor Board
to which the asset has been allocated.
(iv)
The liabilities of the existing Board which cannot be assigned under (iii)
above to any asset shall be apportioned
between the successor Boards in
the aforesaid population ratio.
3.10.2 For consideration of tariff proposal of the
Board for determination of tariff
for 2001-02, the year 1999-2000
is taken as the Previous Year (Actuals),
2000-01 as the Current Year (Estimated)
and 2001-02 as the Ensuing Year
(Projected). The Board submitted
the actual cost and revenue data
in its proposal as provisional for
1999-2000 based on the Statement
of Accounts of that year of undivided
Board by bifurcating the figures
in the ratio of 26:74, estimated
figures for 2000 - 01 over the bifurcated
figures of 1999-2000 and projected
figures for 2001-02 over 2000-01
since the Statement of Accounts
for the 1999-2000 of the Board is
not finalised and audited as yet.
In view of the above, the Commission
has relaxed the requirements of
audited accounts of 1999-2000.
4. PUBLIC RESPONSE TO BOARD’S PETITION
4.1 Public Hearings and Written Responses
4.1.1 The Commission gave vide publicity to the
tariff proposals submitted by Board
and invited the public objections
/ comments. Written observations
from 564 individuals and representatives
of various organizations (listed
at Annexure II) were received by
the Commission. Special public hearing
of farmers was also conducted on
11th July 2001 at Indore.
4.1.2 The Commission received valuable suggestions
on a number of specific issues during
public hearings and through written
responses, besides a large number
of general observations for improving
the efficiency of Board and thereby
minimising the need for enhancement
of tariff. Observations having bearing
on tariff determination have been
classified and are being dealt with
in the following paragraphs.
4.1.3 The Commission has considered all the suggestions,
observations and objections while
finalizing its Order. The Commission
has to strike a balance between
the interests of the consumers on
the one hand and that of the Board
on the other. While the rationale
for the conclusions arrived at by
the Commission are given in the
subsequent paragraphs of this Order,
definite views of the Commission
on the suggestions and observations
of the public are indicated briefly
against the different items.
4.2 General Issues
4.2.1 Public, in general, has strongly opposed
the substantial increase in tariff
proposed by the Board for the reasons
such as supply of irregular and
poor quality of power, theft / pilferage
of energy and the inefficiency of
the Board.
4.2.2 The Commission has given specific directions
to the Board for checking and controlling
the theft and for improving its
performance. The Commission has
adopted a judicious approach in
determining the tariff.
4.3 Meter Installation, meter-reading and
billing
4.3.1 Shri Jawahar Lal Rathore, Indore, Mandsaur
Chamber of Commerce and Pithampur
Udyogik Sangathan objected to the
high price of meters charged. Shri
Bharat Bhushan Bhargava, Shri Suresh
Mittal (Gwalior), Viapari Association,
Khargone and others said that electronic
meters should be provided at reasonable
cost or at Board’s expense and only
when necessary. It was also objected
that meter reading is irregular
and wrong bills showing very high
charges are being issued in large
number of cases and there are several
instances, where bill amounts are
reduced subsequently.
4.3.2 Electronic meters are essential to measure
the electricity consumption more
accurately and to help checking
of theft and pilferage. The Commission
expects that the Board will practice
transparency and exercise due economy
in their purchase so that the consumer
is satisfied and not burdened unduly.
The Board will also improve its
meter reading and billing system
making it more transparent and less
liable to errors, so as to reduce
consumer grievances on this account.
PREVIOUS | MAIN | NEXT GO TO TOP
|